Blogs > Daily Freeman Fact Check blog

A fact-checking blog for the Daily Freeman

Monday, November 28, 2011

Comment policy

Kingston resident Lowell Thing used the Fact Check box to raise an issue about comments. He writes:


I just posted a comment on Kyle Wind's story about the posters at the TRANSART building on Henry Street but it seems to have disappeared. I did seem to get a confirmation but no longer see my comment. If it takes a while before a comment appears, perhaps you could note that in your instructions for making comments. (My comment was positive, incidentally.)

Comments are moderated and take a bit to process. Here is our commenting policy:



We encourage your feedback and dialog. All comments are moderated by the editors. We ask you to follow a few simple guidelines when commenting on stories on DailyFreeman.com.
1) Please post responsibly.
2) Be polite.
3) Don't hate.
4) If you object to someone's post, use the "Report Abuse" button and we'll review it.
5) Users who don't play by the rules will be blocked and won't be allowed to participate.
6) Self-promotion of businesses or advertisements of anything for sale are not permitted.


Freeman publisher Ira Fusfeld clarified this further in a previous blog post:

Have something to say on our web page? Go at it. No space limitations, no time constraints and very little moderating on the newspaper's part. Pick a story at www.dailyfreeman.com, and comment away. You have to register with your real first and last names. If you're not brave enough to attach your opinion to your name for the public's edification, come up with a screen name and your anonymity will be protected. All we ask if for you to keep it clean and tasteful (admittedly a subjective determination). And, of course, no libel. Absent any transgressions, your posts will be approved in due time. They're reviewed periodically on weekdays, less frequently nights and weekends, so have a little patience. (Another sure thing: Some hot head will complain that his/her posts have been blocked because we don't agree with them. Let it be repeated for the umpteenth time that if the only posts the editors approved who those with which we agreed, there would be far fewer on the site. Catch our drift?)

Labels:

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home